A boutique commercial law practice based in Los Angeles, California, with offices in Beverly Hills, Chicago and San Francisco Bay areas, our philosophy is to provide superior quality legal services at competitive rates. While active in a broad range of practice areas, the firm focuses on the specialized needs of companies in the business of e-commerce, including but not limited to internet advertising, online defamation, digital marketing and lead generation, as well as corporate and general business matters. This allows us to provide tailored legal services for the rapidly-evolving digital marketplace, while maintaining highly effective representation for clients facing traditional business law challenges.

The Internet Law Group^® is not your typical law firm. We pride ourselves on providing the care and personal attention that only a boutique law firm can provide. Our ideal client would be a small to mid-sized technology company that requires top tier advocacy and guidance, but that would prefer to avoid having to educate its counsel regarding the fundamentals of internet commerce.

Trust in TILG^® attorneys to competently see a matter through from inception to trial, and continuing aggressively into the post-judgment collection phase. The attorneys of The Internet Law Group have handled cutting-edge click-fraud, email marketing, telemarketing, internet defamation, internet copyright and trademark, website accessibility (ADA/Unruh), business tort, trade secret and class action defense matters, and thousands of contract disputes, often with complex jurisdictional components. We also regularly represent clients in civil prosecutions involving potential six and seven figure consequences.

The anonymity of the internet can make it a haven for fraudsters who perpetrate their deception only to disappear into the night, often reinventing themselves as different entities and hiding behind misused corporate entities. The Internet Law Group is as adept at pursuing and bringing financial perpetrators to justice as it is at defending its clients.

TILG enjoys an excellent track record for clients that seek our advice before trouble strikes. We have negotiated and drafted countless contracts, including affiliate/publisher, advertiser, data management, internet/email service provider, licensing and hosting agreements, to name a few. We can handle all of your corporate and business transactions needs ranging from forming a new business all the way through to the merger or acquisition of a new company.

The six attorneys that comprise The Internet Law Group have over 100 years of combined experience in private practice. We offer top tier credentials and educational backgrounds. Whether your matter involves litigation, transactions, legal compliance or intellectual property, TILG provides exceptional legal services.

Please contact us today for a telephone consultation to discuss your legal needs.

The Internet Law Group. We understand your business.

Notable:

August 11, 2023: Federal appeals court issues published opinion reversing denial of RICO claims in fraud action (9th Circuit Court of Appeals, representing Plaintiffs and Appellants).

August 2, 2023: TTAB grants Respondent’s motion dismiss complaint seeking cancellation of trademark (Trademark Trial and Appeals Board, Representing Respondent).

March 2023: TILG releases “Website Policy and Agreements” Video (LexisNexis Practical Guidance).

November 7, 2022: Order to transfer disputed domain name to Complainant based on UDRP panel finding of bad faith use by Respondent (World Intellectual Property Organization, Representing Complainant).

August 2022: TILG publishes updated “Website Policy and Agreements” Practice Note (LexisNexis Practical Guidance).

November 1, 2021: Summary judgment enforcing settlement of complaint alleging breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and related causes of action (Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, representing Defendant and moving party).

October 29, 2021: Summary judgment dismissal of complaint alleging interference with contractual relations, trade libel and unfair business act pursuant to Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 (Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, representing Defendant, moving party).

September 29, 2021: Permanent injunction against domain registrar based on finding of bad faith intent to profit off of infringing use of Plaintiff’s trademarks (United States District Court, Central District of California, representing Plaintiff, moving party).

July 2021: TILG publishes inaugural “Website Policy and Agreements” Practice Note (LexisNexis Practical Guidance).

February 10, 2021: Dismissal of complaint alleging violations of California’s Restrictions on Unsolicited Commercial Email for lack of personal jurisdiction (United States District Court, Central District of California, representing Defendant).

August 25, 2020: Denial of motion to dismiss claims for trademark infringement, false designation of origin, false advertising and unfair competition (United States District Court, Central District of California, representing Plaintiff).

August 10, 2020: Order to transfer disputed domain names to Complainant based on UDRP panel finding of bad faith use by Respondent (World Intellectual Property Organization, Representing Complainant).

May 22, 2020: Denial of motion to dismiss claims for civil RICO, fraud and breach of warranty (United States District Court, Central District of California, representing Plaintiffs).

2019 Legal Elite Awards recipient for Best Commercial Law Practice.

March 6, 2018: Dismissal of putative class action under California Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17529.5 affirmed on appeal (9th Circuit Court of Appeals, represented Defendants and Appellees, click here for details).

July 12, 2017: Denial of Petition for Review (California Supreme Court, representing Respondent).

February 17, 2017: Dismissal with prejudice of breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and related causes of action (Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, representing Defendant).

December 29, 2016: Dismissal with prejudice of putative class action alleging violations of California Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17529.5 restrictions on unsolicited commercial email (United States District Court, Northern District of California, representing Defendants).

June 13, 2016: Final approval of class settlement in certified class action alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227 (United States District Court, Southern District of California, representing Defendants).